Polyurethane foam concrete lifting is the new norm in Denver

Regardless of whether it is a commercial concrete, residential concrete or municipal concrete, having issues with concrete is very common because of which there so many various ways to fix the issues. There are so many ways to fix these issues there is a cheap method, an expensive method, and almost everyone will find a method which will be the perfect fit for their concrete.

The two of the most popular methods used to raise concrete when there is a void underneath are mudjacking and polyurethane foam (also known as polyurethane foam injections). Concrete raising foam/concrete lifting foam is relatively a new method than the typical mudjacking which is quite old, the most significant difference between mudjacking and concrete raising foam is the price. Now even though polyurethane foam injections cost less when compared to some other methods, it still costs almost five times as much as the typical mudjacking, but then concrete lifting foam has its merits which might make it worthwhile to pay the excess amount.

Polyurethane foam concrete lifting is cleaner than mudjacking

Decor matters a lot when it comes to concrete repairs especially when it is for residential or commercial concrete and polyurethane foam does the job most neatly and cleanly possible. The holes drilled are very tiny and almost becomes invisible after the repair, however, talking about mudjacking the holes are bigger and therefore more visible even after the finishing touches have been given. To be more precise the holes from mudjacking are off over 2 inches where the holes from polyurethane foam injections are of less than an inch. This makes it clear that if the concrete needs to be attractive then (for example concrete of a luxury car showroom) the excess money is absolutely justifiable.

Polyurethane concrete raising foam: a lightweight alternative to standard mudjacking in Denver

Concrete raising foam does not overburden the soil which is underneath the concrete, and this is just another reason why most governments use polyurethane foam injections rather than using the typical mudjacking method. The reason for this is that polyurethane foam injections weigh about 3.5 pounds per cubic feet where the mud weighs over 140 pounds per cubic feet thus the weight of mud overburden the soil which in future might create problems.

There is however one catch, if mudjacking is used then the strength can be modified by adding or cutting back on the amount of cement added to the mud whereas this is not possible for concrete lifting polyurethane foams because even though they are also prepared and are not out of the box things but this limitation does exist in polyurethane foam’s case. Conclusively, mudjacking is still used by many people because at times the budget is tight, so less cost is given priority over quality; however, polyurethane foam is now adopted in most parts of the globe and not only commercial, but even governmental projects tend to use concrete lifting foam than using the typical mudjacking method. At the end of the day, it all depends on the priority set, and that is exactly why there is no “best” option it all depends on whether it is being used for commercial purposes (if so then which industry, shops or offices or luxurious retail stores)